Jim is beyond most of us here. Completely different level. That is art IMO. The wood grain Jim has shown examples of here is art IMO as well. The forum is lucky to have a guy like Jim who is willing to share his knowledge.Here is some of Jimc's work i bought 15 to 20 years ago for our both at shows.
I would not know where to start.
Here is some of Jimc's work i bought 15 to 20 years ago for our both at shows.
I would not know where to start.
SPI reducer will lay down nicer than HOK reducer. Nothing better.Thanks guys. I followed up with the HOK rep. who said I should use slow reducer being the base has a high metallic load and should be allowed to flow out.
Amen to that. I used to think the gold standard was PPG DT reducers. SPI outperforms DT, no contest. Spraying DBC with SPI's reducers makes it feel like a completely different product versus using DT with DBC. And it's 40% less expensive.SPI reducer will lay down nicer than HOK reducer. Nothing better.
Don
It’s so good even a backyard hack can get good results. It almost sprays itself…Amen to that. I used to think the gold standard was PPG DT reducers. SPI outperforms DT, no contest. Spraying DBC with SPI's reducers makes it feel like a completely different product versus using DT with DBC. And it's 40% less expensive.
I never wanted to spring for the Nason activator since it's in a quart afaik and the Nason jobs I used to do were cheap stuff. The SPI clear activator (Euro is what I usually use) seemed to work just fine, seen one of the jobs years later and it looked great.Would that be Nason 483 series or an SPI cat or does it matter which with the Full-Base ?...