1967 Fairlane

276.jpg
 
I never understood the seatcover thing. My father had ugly green covers put on the two-year old 53 Olds 98 he bought. When he traded the car in, he took the covers off and the seats looked perfect. Drove the car for four years and put 108,000 miles on it (mostly towing a trailer cross-country and up to Alaska. I doubt the dealer gave him an extra dollar for the perfect seats when he traded it in.
 
A good friend of mine has always refused to purchase floor mats. He says he paid for the carpet and he is going to wear it out, the next owner can buy mats to cover the worn carpet.
 
I worked on the Fairlane today. I sanded the cowl and stone guard than epoxy primed white.

282.jpg


283.jpg


I waited a couple of hours than sprayed 3 coats of SPI red waiting 45 minutes between coats. Tomorrow I will spray the clear.

284.jpg


285.jpg
 
Rusty is this car going to be all red or a combo like your mustang?
 
I started block sanding with 320 getting ready for more primer. The fenders and doors are almost ready for paint.

288.jpg


I'm still not happy with the quarter it still needs more priming and blocking

291.jpg


290.jpg
 
I finished block sanding the fenders and doors than I sprayed 2 coats of reduced white epoxy. Next step is to wet sand with 400 than spray the base

292.jpg


293.jpg


294.jpg
 
Rusty, are you going with painted bumpers? Rechome? That's going to be a sweet ride!
 
Bob Hollinshead;12115 said:
Rusty, are you going with painted bumpers? Rechome? That's going to be a sweet ride!

Not sure yet what I will be doing with the bumpers I have been leaning toward body color.
 
Rusty,
Do you feel the white underneath gives the red more "pop" than say a gray or black?
I am curious as to how much the color of the undercoat effects the base color. Not just with Red but any color other than a Candy. My thinking would be that full coverage would produce the same results regardless of the undercoat color but I have been wrong many times before.
Thanks,
Jim
 
If there is full coverage of any color, it doesn't matter if there are candy colored rainbows underneath. The color will look the way it is supposed to look. That's what full coverage means.

If a primer or ground coat gives a color more "pop," it is because full coverage has not been achieved.

Not that there is anything wrong with white primer, I use it all the time.
 
i can put 2 maybe 3 coats of red over white and have an even color that pops . or you can put 4 or 5 coats over gray or black and have a red car. there is a difference when trying to hide white ( lighter color ) or black ( darker color ) dark is harder to hide. just like a primer spot in the middle of a door.
 
shine;12193 said:
i can put 2 maybe 3 coats of red over white and have an even color that pops . or you can put 4 or 5 coats over gray or black and have a red car. there is a difference when trying to hide white ( lighter color ) or black ( darker color ) dark is harder to hide. just like a primer spot in the middle of a door.

i have to agree.
 
Forgive me as I don't want to highjack this thread but the reason I am asking is because I have a gallon of SPI Red stashed away for a future project. I normally only buy the Black epoxy and planned to use it but if the white is what makes the "look" then I will use that.
So what I am reading into this is that white with 2-3 coats of Red base will produce a different result than black with 2-3 coats of Red base. Am I correct in assuming then that Red is more transparent and 2-3 coats would not be full coverage?
 
Back
Top